Difference between revisions of "All problems solved"
imported>Denny (New page: {{pubdate|13|December|2006}} Today I feel a lot like the nameless hero from the PhD comics, and what is currently happening to him ([http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=789...) |
imported>Denny |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{pubdate|13|December|2006}} | {{pubdate|13|December|2006}} | ||
| − | Today I feel a lot like the nameless hero from the PhD comics, and what is currently happening to him ([http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=789 begin of the storyline], [http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=792 continuation], [http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=794 especially here], and | + | Today I feel a lot like the nameless hero from the PhD comics, and what is currently happening to him ([http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=789 begin of the storyline], [http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=792 continuation], [http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=794 especially here], and [http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=795 very much like here], but pitily, not at all like [http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=796 here]). Today we had [[Boris Motik]] visiting the [[AIFB]], who is one of the brightest people on this planet. And he gave us a more than interesting talk on [http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~bmotik/publications/papers/mhs06constraints-report.pdf how to integrate OWL with relational databases]. What especially interested me was his great work on constraints -- especially since I was working on similar issues, [http://www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/Publikationen/showPublikation?publ_id=1306 unit tests for ontologies], as I think constraints are crucial for evaluating ontologies. |
But Boris just did it much cleaner, better, and more thorough. So, I will dive into his work and try to understand it to see, if there is anything left to do for me, or if I have to refocus. There's still much left, but I am afraid the most interesting part from a theoretic point is solved. Or rather, in the name of progress, I am happy it is solved. Let's get on with the next problem. | But Boris just did it much cleaner, better, and more thorough. So, I will dive into his work and try to understand it to see, if there is anything left to do for me, or if I have to refocus. There's still much left, but I am afraid the most interesting part from a theoretic point is solved. Or rather, in the name of progress, I am happy it is solved. Let's get on with the next problem. | ||
Latest revision as of 17:32, 27 December 2007
Today I feel a lot like the nameless hero from the PhD comics, and what is currently happening to him (begin of the storyline, continuation, especially here, and very much like here, but pitily, not at all like here). Today we had Boris Motik visiting the AIFB, who is one of the brightest people on this planet. And he gave us a more than interesting talk on how to integrate OWL with relational databases. What especially interested me was his great work on constraints -- especially since I was working on similar issues, unit tests for ontologies, as I think constraints are crucial for evaluating ontologies.
But Boris just did it much cleaner, better, and more thorough. So, I will dive into his work and try to understand it to see, if there is anything left to do for me, or if I have to refocus. There's still much left, but I am afraid the most interesting part from a theoretic point is solved. Or rather, in the name of progress, I am happy it is solved. Let's get on with the next problem.
(I *know* it is my own fault)
Originally published on Semantic Nodix
| Previous post: Semantic Wikipedia presentations | Following post: Supporting disaster relief with semantics |
