Difference between revisions of "Partial copyright for an AI generated work"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "{{pubdate|{{subst:CURRENTDAY}}|{{subst:CURRENTMONTHNAME}}|{{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}}} Interesting development in US cases around copyright and AI: author Elisa Shupe asked for co...") |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{pubdate|17|April|2024}} | {{pubdate|17|April|2024}} | ||
− | Interesting development in US cases around copyright and AI: author Elisa Shupe asked for copyright registration on a book that was created with the help of generative AI. Shupe stated that not giving her registration would be disabilities discrimination, since she would not have been able to create her work otherwise. On appeal, her work was partially granted protection | + | Interesting development in US cases around copyright and AI: author Elisa Shupe asked for copyright registration on a book that was created with the help of generative AI. Shupe stated that not giving her registration would be disabilities discrimination, since she would not have been able to create her work otherwise. On appeal, her work was partially granted protection for the “selection, coordination, and arrangement of text generated by artificial intelligence”, without referral to the disability argument. |
* [https://www.wired.com/story/the-us-copyright-office-loosens-up-a-little-on-ai/ Wired: How One Author Pushed the Limits of AI Copyright, by Kate Knibbs] | * [https://www.wired.com/story/the-us-copyright-office-loosens-up-a-little-on-ai/ Wired: How One Author Pushed the Limits of AI Copyright, by Kate Knibbs] |
Latest revision as of 12:47, 17 April 2024
Interesting development in US cases around copyright and AI: author Elisa Shupe asked for copyright registration on a book that was created with the help of generative AI. Shupe stated that not giving her registration would be disabilities discrimination, since she would not have been able to create her work otherwise. On appeal, her work was partially granted protection for the “selection, coordination, and arrangement of text generated by artificial intelligence”, without referral to the disability argument.
Previous entry: Northern Arizona | Next entry: Katherine Maher on The Truth |