Difference between revisions of "Golden"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "{{pubdate|{{subst:CURRENTDAY}}|{{subst:CURRENTMONTHNAME}}|{{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}}} I'd say that Golden might be the most interesting competitor to Wikipedia I've seen in a whi...") |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
# they will make a press release of donating all their content to Wikipedia (even though that's already possible thanks to their license) | # they will make a press release of donating all their content to Wikipedia (even though that's already possible thanks to their license) | ||
# and then, being a for-profit company, they will pivot to something else within a year or two. | # and then, being a for-profit company, they will pivot to something else within a year or two. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [https://golden.com/blog/introducing-golden/ Introducing Golden blog post] | ||
+ | * [https://golden.com/ Golden] | ||
{{tag|Wikipedia}} | {{tag|Wikipedia}} | ||
<noinclude>{{simiapost|english}}</noinclude> | <noinclude>{{simiapost|english}}</noinclude> |
Latest revision as of 08:52, 2 May 2019
I'd say that Golden might be the most interesting competitor to Wikipedia I've seen in a while (which really doesn't mean that much, it's just the others have been really terrible).
This one also has a few red flags:
- closed source, as far as I can tell
- aiming for ten billion topics in their first announcement, but lacking an article on Germany
- obviously not understanding what the point of notability policies are, and no, it is not about server space
They also have a features that, if they work, should be looked at and copied by Wikipedia - such as the editing assistants and some of the social features that are built-in into the platform.
Predictions:
- they will make a splash or two, and have corresponding news cycles to it
- they will, at some point, make an effort to import or transclude Wikipedia content
- they will never make a dent in Wikipedia readership, and will say that they wouldn't want to anyway because they love Wikipedia (which I believe)
- they will make a press release of donating all their content to Wikipedia (even though that's already possible thanks to their license)
- and then, being a for-profit company, they will pivot to something else within a year or two.
Previous entry: May 2019 talks | Next entry: Knowledge Graph Conference 2019, Day 1 |