EON2006 deadline extension - Revision history

imported>Denny: Reverted edits by Ihonevigefa (Talk); changed back to last version by Denny

2010-12-19T08:27:56Z

Reverted edits by Ihonevigefa (Talk); changed back to last version by Denny

imported>Ihonevigefa at 09:08, 24 November 2010

2010-11-24T09:08:01Z

imported>Denny at 23:53, 27 December 2007

2007-12-27T23:53:17Z

imported>Denny: New page: {{pubdate|27|February|2006}} We gave the [http://km.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/ws/eon2006 workshop on Evaluating Ontologies for the Semantic Web] at the [http://www2006.org/ WWW2006 in Edinburg...

2007-12-27T23:52:54Z

New page: {{pubdate|27|February|2006}} We gave the [http://km.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/ws/eon2006 workshop on Evaluating Ontologies for the Semantic Web] at the [http://www2006.org/ WWW2006 in Edinburg...

New page

{{pubdate|27|February|2006}}
We gave the [http://km.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/ws/eon2006 workshop on Evaluating Ontologies for the Semantic Web] at the [http://www2006.org/ WWW2006 in Edinburgh] an extension to the end of the week, due to a number of requests. I think it is more fair to give an extension to all the authors than to allow some of them on request and to deny this possibility to those too shy to ask. If you have something to say on the quality of ontologies and ontology assessment, go ahead and submit! You still have a week to go, and short papers are welcomed as well. The field is exciting and new, and considering the [http://www.eswc2006.org/ accepted ESWC paper] the interest in the field seems to be growing.

A first glance of the submissions reveals an enormous heterogeneity of methods and approaches. Wow, very cool and interesting.

What surprised me was the reaction of some: ''"oh, an extension. You didn't get enough submissions, sorry"''. I know that this is a common reason for deadline extensions, and I was afraid of that, too. A day before the deadline there was exactly one submission and we were considering cancelling the workshop. It's my first workshop and thus such things make me a whole lot nervous. But now, two days after the deadline I am quite more relaxed. The number of submissions is fine, and we know about a few more to come. Still: we are looking for more submissions actively. For the sole purpose of gathering the community of people interested in ontology evaluation in Edinburgh! I expect this workshop to become quite a leap for ontology evaluation, and I want the whole community to be there.

I am really excited about the topic, as I consider it an important foundation for the Semantic Web. And as you know I want the Semantic Web to lift off, the sooner the better. So let's get these foundations right.

For more, take a peek at the [http://km.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/ws/eon2006 ontology evaluation workshop website].

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{pubdate|27|February|2006}}
 We gave the [http://km.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/ws/eon2006 workshop on Evaluating Ontologies for the Semantic Web] at the [http://www2006.org/ WWW2006 in Edinburgh] an extension to the end of the week, due to a number of requests. I think it is more fair to give an extension to all the authors than to allow some of them on request and to deny this possibility to those too shy to ask. If you have something to say on the quality of ontologies and ontology assessment, go ahead and submit! You still have a week to go, and short papers are welcomed as well. The field is exciting and new, and considering the [http://www.eswc2006.org/ accepted ESWC paper] the interest in the field seems to be growing.
@@ Line 5: / Line 4: @@
 A first glance of the submissions reveals an enormous heterogeneity of methods and approaches. Wow, very cool and interesting.
-What surprised me was the reaction of some: ''&quot;oh, an extension. You didn't get enough submissions, sorry&quot;''. I know that this is a common reason for deadline extensions, and I was afraid of that, too. A day before the deadline there was exactly one submission and we were considering cancelling the workshop. It's my first workshop and thus such things make me a whole lot nervous. But now, two days after the deadline I am quite more relaxed. The number of submissions is fine, and we know about a few more to come. Still: we are looking for more submissions actively. For the sole purpose of gathering the community of people interested in ontology evaluation in Edinburgh! I expect this workshop to become quite a leap for ontology evaluation, and I want the whole community to be there.
+What surprised me was the reaction of some: ''"oh, an extension. You didn't get enough submissions, sorry"''. I know that this is a common reason for deadline extensions, and I was afraid of that, too. A day before the deadline there was exactly one submission and we were considering cancelling the workshop. It's my first workshop and thus such things make me a whole lot nervous. But now, two days after the deadline I am quite more relaxed. The number of submissions is fine, and we know about a few more to come. Still: we are looking for more submissions actively. For the sole purpose of gathering the community of people interested in ontology evaluation in Edinburgh! I expect this workshop to become quite a leap for ontology evaluation, and I want the whole community to be there.
 I am really excited about the topic, as I consider it an important foundation for the Semantic Web. And as you know I want the Semantic Web to lift off, the sooner the better. So let's get these foundations right.
@@ Line 11: / Line 10: @@
 For more, take a peek at the [http://km.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/ws/eon2006 ontology evaluation workshop website].
-&lt;noinclude&gt;{{Semantic Nodix post}}&lt;/noinclude&gt;
+<noinclude>{{Semantic Nodix post}}</noinclude>
 {{Missing comments}}

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{pubdate|27|February|2006}}
 We gave the [http://km.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/ws/eon2006 workshop on Evaluating Ontologies for the Semantic Web] at the [http://www2006.org/ WWW2006 in Edinburgh] an extension to the end of the week, due to a number of requests. I think it is more fair to give an extension to all the authors than to allow some of them on request and to deny this possibility to those too shy to ask. If you have something to say on the quality of ontologies and ontology assessment, go ahead and submit! You still have a week to go, and short papers are welcomed as well. The field is exciting and new, and considering the [http://www.eswc2006.org/ accepted ESWC paper] the interest in the field seems to be growing.
@@ Line 4: / Line 5: @@
 A first glance of the submissions reveals an enormous heterogeneity of methods and approaches. Wow, very cool and interesting.
-What surprised me was the reaction of some: ''"oh, an extension. You didn't get enough submissions, sorry"''. I know that this is a common reason for deadline extensions, and I was afraid of that, too. A day before the deadline there was exactly one submission and we were considering cancelling the workshop. It's my first workshop and thus such things make me a whole lot nervous. But now, two days after the deadline I am quite more relaxed. The number of submissions is fine, and we know about a few more to come. Still: we are looking for more submissions actively. For the sole purpose of gathering the community of people interested in ontology evaluation in Edinburgh! I expect this workshop to become quite a leap for ontology evaluation, and I want the whole community to be there.
+What surprised me was the reaction of some: ''&quot;oh, an extension. You didn't get enough submissions, sorry&quot;''. I know that this is a common reason for deadline extensions, and I was afraid of that, too. A day before the deadline there was exactly one submission and we were considering cancelling the workshop. It's my first workshop and thus such things make me a whole lot nervous. But now, two days after the deadline I am quite more relaxed. The number of submissions is fine, and we know about a few more to come. Still: we are looking for more submissions actively. For the sole purpose of gathering the community of people interested in ontology evaluation in Edinburgh! I expect this workshop to become quite a leap for ontology evaluation, and I want the whole community to be there.
 I am really excited about the topic, as I consider it an important foundation for the Semantic Web. And as you know I want the Semantic Web to lift off, the sooner the better. So let's get these foundations right.
@@ Line 10: / Line 11: @@
 For more, take a peek at the [http://km.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/ws/eon2006 ontology evaluation workshop website].
-<noinclude>{{Semantic Nodix post}}</noinclude>
+&lt;noinclude&gt;{{Semantic Nodix post}}&lt;/noinclude&gt;
 {{Missing comments}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:53, 27 December 2007
Line 9:		Line 9:

	For more, take a peek at the [http://km.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/ws/eon2006 ontology evaluation workshop website].		For more, take a peek at the [http://km.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/ws/eon2006 ontology evaluation workshop website].
		+
		+	<noinclude>{{Semantic Nodix post}}</noinclude>
		+	{{Missing comments}}